b***@gmail.com
2012-02-28 17:27:45 UTC
I have two Sun Blade 150 clients, one loaded with Solaris 8, the other Solaris 10.
I noticed that if I put the clients on a "dumb" KVM (Avocent SwitchView USB 4-Port), that the Solaris 8 machine works when switching between KVM channels (the /var/adm/messages log shows 20+ usb related events from kernel and usba)
The Solaris 10 machine will not reconnect to the KVM, and I have to SSH into the box and reboot it.
What's going on with Solaris 10? Why is it not as robust as Solaris 8 when the USB keyboard/mouse is switched on a "dumb" KVM?
Anyone had similar experiences?
When I SSH into the misbehaving Solaris 10 machine and do a "cfgadm", I can see that the USB devices have disconnected, but they are never able to reconnect, no matter what combination of cfgadm commands I try. Only a reboot of Solaris 10 fixes the problem. A sub-optimal solution.
And yes, newer "smart" KVM's work (IOGear GCS1734), just not the Avocent.
Any help is appreciated.
Brian
I noticed that if I put the clients on a "dumb" KVM (Avocent SwitchView USB 4-Port), that the Solaris 8 machine works when switching between KVM channels (the /var/adm/messages log shows 20+ usb related events from kernel and usba)
The Solaris 10 machine will not reconnect to the KVM, and I have to SSH into the box and reboot it.
What's going on with Solaris 10? Why is it not as robust as Solaris 8 when the USB keyboard/mouse is switched on a "dumb" KVM?
Anyone had similar experiences?
When I SSH into the misbehaving Solaris 10 machine and do a "cfgadm", I can see that the USB devices have disconnected, but they are never able to reconnect, no matter what combination of cfgadm commands I try. Only a reboot of Solaris 10 fixes the problem. A sub-optimal solution.
And yes, newer "smart" KVM's work (IOGear GCS1734), just not the Avocent.
Any help is appreciated.
Brian